Judgment Hašcák v. Slovakia - Secret surveillance “Gorilla operation” was not in accordance with the law

CtEDO 2023-05-15 0,89

Published on 5 June 2023 FIRST SECTION Applications nos. 13284/22 and 12127/23 Jaroslav HAŠČÁK against Slovakia lodged on 4 March 2022 and 15 March 2023 respectively communicated on 15 May 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications co

CtEDO 2024-09-24 0,88

”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Bálintová. The circumstances of the case 4. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background 5. The applicant is a prominent businessman associated with a

CtEDO 2023-10-26 0,88

the finding of a violation of his rights and in an award of compensation. However, in no circumstances did they have the potential to bring about a change in the status quo regarding the continued retention and use of the intercept material

CtEDO 2022-06-01 0,87

on 1 June 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged insufficient reasoning provided in domestic courts’ decisions authorising surveillance measures against the applicant. On 12 March 2010 the investigative judge i

CtEDO 2017-10-05 0,87

linked to the “Gorilla” operation in the Regional Court’s domain, the Constitutional Court observed that the material “was in court files, did not originate from the actions of the Regional Court and was not the product of secret surveillan