ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 30.06.2022 RO

Judgment Rusishvili v. Georgia - Failure to provide reasons for inadmissibility of appeal violated the European Convention

HOTĂRÂRE

30.06.2022

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Rusishvili v. Georgia - Failure to provide reasons for inadmissibility of appeal violated the European Convention (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-10-05

EPELDIMOVA v. RUSSIA

substantive Convention provision the Court finds that the applicant’s complaint under Article 13 of the Convention is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these rea

CtEDO 2021-12-07

DERKACHEV v. RUSSIA

foregoing, the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention must be rejected for the failure to comply with the six ‐ month time-limit within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the

CtEDO 2021-05-27

BOSTOGHANASHVILI v. GEORGIA

-law. 42. It follows that this part of the application is also manifestly ill‐founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application i

CtEDO 2022-05-31

KHASHAGULGOVY v. RUSSIA

applicants’ complaint was lodged out of time (compare Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 275, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and, for a similar situation, Dashuyeva v. Russia [Committee] (dec.) no. 5725/11, §§ 47-48, 19

CtEDO 2022-05-24

it. 16. Regard being had to the above, the Court considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession, this application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convent

Sursă