ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 07.07.2022 RO

Decision Thibaut and Thibaut v. France - planned extra-high-voltage line: Article 8 complaint rejected as manifestly ill-founded

HOTĂRÂRE
07.07.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Thibaut and Thibaut v. France - planned extra-high-voltage line: Article 8 complaint rejected as manifestly ill-founded (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-03-20
0,87
ROZENBLAT v. UKRAINE
not completely restricted in his rights and he has failed to demonstrate the concrete adverse impact of the measure in question on his professional or private life. 29. It follows that the applicant’s Article 8 complaint is manifestly ill‐f
CtEDO 2021-02-04
0,87
KOMTEKH-PLUS, PF NVP v. UKRAINE
(see paragraph 60 above) that the applicant company’s complaint that the Lviv Commercial Court of Appeal and the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine had exceeded their jurisdiction was manifestly ill-founded. In addition, there is nothing in
CtEDO 2016-08-30
0,86
PYTEL v. POLAND
Court finds that the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected, pursuant to Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanim
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,86
KRAVETS v. UKRAINE
the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reas
CtEDO 2008-12-09
0,86
WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND (NO. 2)
. Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Takes note of the terms o
Sursă