ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 13.07.2022 RO

Advisory opinion on the difference in treatment between landowners’ associations “having a recognised existence on the date of the creation of an approved municipal hunters’ association” and landowners’ associations set up after that date - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
FRA
HOTĂRÂRE
13.07.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Advisory opinion on the difference in treatment between landowners’ associations “having a recognised existence on the date of the creation of an approved municipal hunters’ association” and landowners’ associations set up after that date - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-10-04
0,88
CASE OF CHABAUTY v. FRANCE
Court of 23 March 2005 and rejected the applicant’s application for judicial review. The Conseil d’Etat held, inter alia, as follows: “... The evidence in the file shows that Mr Chabauty, who owns land with a surface area below that specifi
CtEDO 2022-09-14
0,88
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No
CtEDO 2005-02-24
0,87
CASE OF BIRNLEITNER v. AUSTRIA
on 25 January 1994. 11. On 10 March 1994 the appointed official hunting expert ( jagdfachlicher Amtssachverständiger ) filed an expertise on the question whether supplementary community land had to be assigned to the applicant’s hunting gro
CtEDO 2020-01-30
0,87
CASE OF J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Rem
CtEDO 2022-02-23
0,87
CASE OF DUMITRU AGAINST FRANCE AND 1 OTHER CASE
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)28 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 23 February 2022 at the 1426 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Application
Sursă