CtEDO 13.07.2022 RO

Advisory opinion on the difference in treatment between landowners’ associations “having a recognised existence on the date of the creation of an approved municipal hunters’ association” and landowners’ associations set up after that date

RESPONDENT
FRA
HOTĂRÂRE
13.07.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Advisory opinion on the difference in treatment between landowners’ associations “having a recognised existence on the date of the creation of an approved municipal hunters’ association” and landowners’ associations set up after that date (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-10-04
0,88
CASE OF CHABAUTY v. FRANCE
Court of 23 March 2005 and rejected the applicant’s application for judicial review. The Conseil d’Etat held, inter alia, as follows: “... The evidence in the file shows that Mr Chabauty, who owns land with a surface area below that specifi
CtEDO 2005-02-24
0,86
CASE OF BIRNLEITNER v. AUSTRIA
on 25 January 1994. 11. On 10 March 1994 the appointed official hunting expert ( jagdfachlicher Amtssachverständiger ) filed an expertise on the question whether supplementary community land had to be assigned to the applicant’s hunting gro
CtEDO 2024-09-18
0,85
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. LITHUANIA
in the applicant association’s initial case of Ancient Baltic religious association “Romuva” v. Lithuania (no. 48329/19, 8 June 2021) or does it contain relevant new information capable of giving rise to a fresh violation of the Convention?
CtEDO 2022-06-30
0,85
CASE OF COUTRE AND BATAILLER AGAINST FRANCE
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)157 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Francis Coutre and Daniel Batailler against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 June 2022 at the 1438 th meeting of the Ministers'
CtEDO 2012-06-26
0,85
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY
ing the obligation to tolerate hunting. 36. In four member States the legislation or case-law has been amended following the Court’s judgment in the case of Chassagnou and Others, cited above. In France, under the Loi Voynet of 26 July 2000
Sursă