Decision Piperea v. Romania - Complaint against Romanian COVID-19 measures inadmissible

CtEDO 2021-09-28 0,90

nt did not put forward such a complaint in his constitutional complaint (see paragraph 13 above). 46. Accordingly, this complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For th

CtEDO 2021-03-11 0,90

this complaint does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. 15. It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35

CtEDO 2020-10-20 0,90

that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 20. Accordingly the Court considers that the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accord

CtEDO 2022-02-22 0,90

matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms ensh

CtEDO 2022-07-05 0,90

au respect de sa vie privée a concrètement été lésé. 13. Elle accorde aussi de l’importance au fait que le requérant n’a pas expliqué précisément quels effets ces mesures avaient eu sur son état. De manière plus générale, il n’a présenté au