CtEDO 15.09.2022 Auto

CASE OF O.M. AND D.S. v. UKRAINE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
15.09.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4) Rejection of application at any stage of the proceedings;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Kyrgyzstan);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF O.M. AND D.S. v. UKRAINE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victime;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-4) Respingerea aplicării în orice etapă a procedurii;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Expulsie) (Kirghizstan);Încălcarea articoluluiui 34 - Aplicații individuale (art. 34 - Incalca exercitarea dreptului la cerere); prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-09-15
0,99
CASE OF O.M. AND D.S. v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4)
CtEDO 2022-09-15
0,99
CASE OF O.M. AND D.S. v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4)
CtEDO 2021-02-09
0,95
CASE OF N.Ç. v. TURKEY - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Ar
CtEDO 2021-02-09
0,95
CASE OF N.Ç. v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Ar
CtEDO 2022-11-22
0,95
CASE OF G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Viol
Sursă