ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 29.09.2022 RO

Decision Nastase v. Romania - criminal proceedings for illegally importing goods into Romania for own use : application inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
29.09.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Decision Nastase v. Romania - criminal proceedings for illegally importing goods into Romania for own use : application inadmissible (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-09-14
0,89
NĂSTASE v. ROMANIA
for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reason
CtEDO 2020-02-11
0,89
SEVASTRE v. ROMANIA
ambit of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. 36. It follows that the application is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3, and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4. F
CtEDO 2018-12-04
0,89
NĂSTASE v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
example, Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, §§ 32-38, Series A no. 277 ‐ A) the Court considers that, regard being had to the margin of appreciation allowed to the Moldovan authorities, the applicant’s conviction in absentia and the ref
CtEDO 2021-11-09
0,89
SINCAR v. ROMANIA
fulness of his detention could be examined by the courts, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 36. However, in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence,
CtEDO 2022-02-08
0,88
CAERIDIN v. ROMANIA
out in the Convention or its Protocols. 24. Accordingly, the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the
Sursă