CtEDO 06.10.2022 RO

Decision Thevenon v. France - application concerning suspension-from-post orders for refusal to vaccinate against covid-19: inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
06.10.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Decision Thevenon v. France - application concerning suspension-from-post orders for refusal to vaccinate against covid-19: inadmissible (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-07-03
0,88
A.B.G. v. SPAIN
want to be vaccinated because his family would not allow him. 8. The First Instance Court concluded that A.’s vaccination was a necessary measure to protect his health considering (i) the medical and forensic reports, in which it was stated
CtEDO 2025-04-24
0,88
E.C. v. SPAIN
that they disagreed about her vaccination, and that she did not want to be vaccinated, but “did not know the reason” ( sic ). 5. On 13 July 2022 the Valencia First Instance Court no. 24 issued a decision authorising L.’s father to proceed w
CtEDO 2022-09-14
0,88
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No
CtEDO 2022-04-26
0,88
MEDICA v. CROATIA
’ decisions complained of did not constitute an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for her home (see, by converse implication, Ćosić v. Croatia, no. 28261/06, § 19, 15 January 2009), and that she no longer runs any risk of e
CtEDO 2021-07-06
0,88
TEPLJAKOV v. ESTONIA
vention of disorder or crime and for the protection of the rights of others. 46. It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons
Sursă