CtEDO 14.10.2025 RO

Judgment Tsatani v. Greece - Lack of guarantee of impartiality in disciplinary proceedings brought by the President of the Court of Cassation against a prosecutor (Greek translation)

HOTĂRÂRE

14.10.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Tsatani v. Greece - Lack of guarantee of impartiality in disciplinary proceedings brought by the President of the Court of Cassation against a prosecutor (Greek translation) (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2024-06-18

0,88

EFSTATHOPOULOS v. GREECE

rejection of the relevant adjournment request. By judgment no. 2058/2018, the Court of Cassation rejected the cassation appeal. Regarding the issue of the non-attendance of N.S. at the appeal hearing, the Court of Cassation dismissed the re

CtEDO 2023-01-09

0,87

VLYSIDIS v. GREECE

ation in its decision no. 1422/2017, finalised on 25 October 2017. The Court of Cassation considered that the civil courts were not bound by the decisions of the criminal courts and that no doubt as to the applicant’s innocence had been cas

CtEDO 2022-10-19

0,87

CASE OF GEORGAKOPOULOS AND OTHERS AGAINST GREECE

s in response to the violation of Article 13, concerning the effective remedy aimed at ensuring enforcement of domestic judgments are examined in the context of the execution of judgments of the Beka-Koulocheri (38878/03) group of cases and

CtEDO 2025-04-25

0,87

NAFTILIAKI TECHNODOMIKI EMBORIKI AE v. GREECE

the grounds that the consecutive adjournments of the examination of the case, which were based on erroneous application of national law, progressively led to loss of its civil rights due to discontinuance of the criminal proceedings. QUESTI

CtEDO 2022-03-08

0,87

DIAMANTOPOULOS v. GREECE

Ilias Papageorgiou v. Greece, no. 44101/13, §§ 20-25, 10 December 2020). The case concerned a criminal acquittal which took place before the appellate court’s finding of civil liability for slanderous defamation. The court held that for the

Sursă