ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 08.11.2022 RO

Judgment Valeanu and Others v. Romania - New scheme for restitution of property taken by communist dictatorship found inadequate

HOTĂRÂRE
08.11.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Valeanu and Others v. Romania - New scheme for restitution of property taken by communist dictatorship found inadequate (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-12-14
0,90
CASE OF GRIGORESCU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA
the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants received the just satisfaction awarded by the Court, including the amounts awarded for pecuniary damage, as restitution of the original property was not possible in
CtEDO 2022-06-10
0,90
CASE OF ȘTEFĂNESCU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
government regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court; Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants received the just satisfaction awarded by the Court, including the
CtEDO 2021-12-08
0,90
CASE OF MEȚIANU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
just satisfaction awarded by the Court; Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants received the just satisfaction awarded by the Court, including the amounts awarded for pecuniary damage, as
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,89
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,89
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
Sursă