ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 10.11.2022 RO

Judgment The Karibu Foundation v. Norway - Limitations on ground-rent increases did not violate lessor’s property rights

HOTĂRÂRE
10.11.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment The Karibu Foundation v. Norway - Limitations on ground-rent increases did not violate lessor’s property rights (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-05-11
0,92
THE KARIBU FOUNDATION v. NORWAY
May 2016 owners of the property now owned by the applicant organisation initiated proceedings before Oslo City Court regarding adjustment of the rent for the ground lease ( tomtefesteavgiften ), relying on the amended act. On 24 January 201
CtEDO 2022-05-24
0,86
SAARIVUOMA SAMEBY v. NORWAY
THE PARTIES 1. In view of the applicant community’s arguments, including that the Supreme Court did not award any compensation: has there been a violation of any rights belonging to it under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? 2.
CtEDO 2022-06-23
0,86
CASE OF ARAMBAŠIN v. CROATIA
the remedy and the persons concerned be enabled and obliged to use it (see, for example, Kirinčić and Others v. Croatia, no. 31386/17, § 115, 30 July 2020). 15. Since the applicants lodged their application with the Court on 5 July 2017 and
CtEDO 2022-06-23
0,86
CASE OF HEGEDIŠ v. CROATIA
tionate burden on her because she had not owned any other property that would meet her housing needs. Moreover, the costs of the condominium fee that she had been obliged to pay as the owner of the flat occupied by the protected lessee and
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,86
CASE OF GOŠOVIĆ v. CROATIA
to protected rent; the applicant thus having no right to charge her the market rent for living in his flat. That was so because they found that N.R.’s summer home did not constitute a habitable house within the meaning of section 31(2) of t
Sursă