CtEDO 17.01.2023 RO

Judgment Axel Springer SE v. Germany - Being made to publish a correction to a newspaper article had not violated the publisher’s freedom of expression

HOTĂRÂRE

17.01.2023

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Axel Springer SE v. Germany - Being made to publish a correction to a newspaper article had not violated the publisher’s freedom of expression (CtEDO, 2023)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-09-30

0,91

AXEL SPRINGER SE v. GERMANY

Published on 18 October 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 8964/18 AXEL SPRINGER SE against Germany lodged on 14 February 2018 communicated on 30 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a court decision against a

CtEDO 2025-12-16

0,89

CASE OF EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE NEWSPAPER AND INTERNET PORTAL MAGYAR HANG AND ALHAMBRA PRESS BT v. HUNGARY

the press conference. For the court, I.T. was a businessperson who did not discuss issues of politics or affairs of general interest in public; and he could not be qualified as a public figure solely by considering his business interests or

CtEDO 2013-10-16

0,88

VERLAGSGRUPPE NEWS GMBH v. AUSTRIA

application to the Supreme Court under Article 363a of the Code of Criminal Procedure an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 in respect of the applicant company’s complaint under Article 10? 2. Has there been a violation o

CtEDO 2016-03-04

0,88

AXEL SPRINGER AG AND RTL TELEVISION GMBH v. GERMANY

Communicated on 4 March 2016 FIFTH SECTION Application no 51405/12 AXEL SPRINGER AG and RTL TELEVISION GMBH against Germany lodged on 8 August 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a judicial order of the president of a c

CtEDO 2023-01-17

0,88

CASE OF AXEL SPRINGER SE v. GERMANY - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

ha f. Um zu beurteilen, ob der die beantragte egendarstellung veröffentlicht. Da r - Eingriff in die Rechte des bf Unternehmens im vorlie- unter war ein Vermerk des Redakteurs abgedruckt, der genden Fall »in einer demokratischen esellsc ha

Sursă