CtEDO 04.04.2023 RO

Judgment Gashi and Gina v. Albania - Delayed reinstatement of suspended prosecutor after criminal investigation set aside violated Article 8

HOTĂRÂRE

04.04.2023

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Gashi and Gina v. Albania - Delayed reinstatement of suspended prosecutor after criminal investigation set aside violated Article 8 (CtEDO, 2023)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2024-12-11

0,90

CASE OF GASHI AND GINA AGAINST ALBANIA

Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)338 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Gashi and Gina against Albania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 December 2024 at the 1515 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applic

CtEDO 2018-09-07

0,90

GASHI AND GINA v. ALBANIA

their immediate suspension from their duties for an arbitrary indefinite period of time without any possibility of judicial review? (see Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, ECHR 2017 (extracts), No. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004-VI

CtEDO 2021-09-23

0,89

SHETI AND GJASHTA v. ALBANIA

law in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions, Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions as a result of the failure to enforce the judgment in the applicant’s favour. Supreme Court

CtEDO 2020-01-21

0,89

CASE OF STRAZIMIRI v. ALBANIA - [Albanian Translation] by the General State Advocature of Albania

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Person

CtEDO 2019-01-25

0,88

NIKEHASANI v. ALBANIA

missal from office as a prosecutor? (see Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, ECHR 2017 (extracts), No. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004-VI; Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, ECHR 2005 ‐ X)? In the affirmative, was the in

Sursă