Judgment Drozd v. Poland - Ban on entry to the Sejm for displaying a banner violated the Convention

CtEDO 2020-06-30 0,90

on their access to the Sejm buildings constitute a breach of their rights guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention. 2. They further maintain, relying on Articles 6, 10 and 13 of the Convention, that they did not have an effective remedy i

CtEDO 2022-02-01 0,89

that a violation of this prohibition, which also applied to lustration cases, could not be justified by a journalist’s subjective sense of acting in the public interest or by the fact that S.D. was a public figure. On 22 February 2018 the S

CtEDO 2022-03-30 0,89

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)73 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Doroż against Poland (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 March 2022 at the 1430 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Application No. Case

CtEDO 2023-11-27 0,88

. The applicant complains under Article 11 of the Convention that the blanket Governmental ban on public assemblies and the ensuing domestic decisions prohibiting his planned demonstration to take place constituted an unnecessary and dispro

CtEDO 2023-03-15 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)48 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Dariusz Kornacki against Poland (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2023 at the 1460 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicati