Inter-state case Georgia v. Russia (IV) declared admissible

CtEDO 2022-05-24 0,90

it. 16. Regard being had to the above, the Court considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession, this application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convent

CtEDO 2021-05-27 0,89

-law. 42. It follows that this part of the application is also manifestly ill‐founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application i

CtEDO 2022-05-31 0,89

applicants’ complaint was lodged out of time (compare Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 275, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and, for a similar situation, Dashuyeva v. Russia [Committee] (dec.) no. 5725/11, §§ 47-48, 19

CtEDO 2021-05-11 0,89

appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. 26. It follows that these complaints must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Cou

CtEDO 2021-10-19 0,89

. 19. Regard being had to the above, the Court accepts the Government’s objection and finds that this complaint must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares