CtEDO 01.06.2023 RO

Judgment Maymulakhin and Markiv v. Ukraine - Lack of legal recognition and protection for same-sex couple violated the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE
01.06.2023
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Maymulakhin and Markiv v. Ukraine - Lack of legal recognition and protection for same-sex couple violated the Convention (CtEDO, 2023)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-04-04
0,89
MARKUSH v. UKRAINE
. Ukraine, nos. 27276/15 and 33692/15, §§ 120-27, 12 January 2023, and Golovin v. Ukraine, no. 47052/18, §§ 32-36, 13 July 2023)? 2. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for her private life within the meanin
CtEDO 2023-08-30
0,88
PAVLISHCHUK v. UKRAINE
of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 69 ‐ 72, 1 July 2021)? 3. Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on
CtEDO 2022-11-10
0,88
GALYCHYY v. UKRAINE
v. Ukraine (dec), no. 33641/17, 12 April 2018). In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the C
CtEDO 2021-04-22
0,88
CASE OF POLTORATSKYY v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 13+8
CtEDO 2021-10-07
0,88
DANILOV v. UKRAINE
any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the
Sursă