Judgment Bavcar v. Slovenia - Justice Minister’s statements violated presumption of innocence

CtEDO 2025-11-13 0,89

domestic courts and their interpretation of domestic law. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Presumption of innocence and impartial tribunal 11. The relevant principles concerning the right to the presumption of innocence under Article 6 § 2 of the Con

CtEDO 2023-09-18 0,89

(see, for example, Peruš v. Slovenia, no. 35016/05, § 38, 27 September 2012; Meng v. Germany, no. 1128/17, §§ 42-52 and 54-63, 16 February 2021; and Mucha v. Slovakia, no. 63703/19, §§ 50-68, 25 November 2021)? 2. Was the presumption of inn

CtEDO 2019-09-16 0,88

Court? 2.1. In particular, was the applicant’s presumption of innocence breached by the wording used by the investigating judge when addressing the gravity of the offence in the decisions of 5 September 2018 and 7 January 2019 (for example,

CtEDO 2022-03-02 0,88

Published on 21 March 2022 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 42760/16 Oldřich MACHALICKÝ against the Czech Republic lodged on 18 July 2016 communicated on 2 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns mainly the alleged breac

CtEDO 2021-02-11 0,88

that the offence of money laundering could be committed by direct or indirect intent. It concluded that the case ‐ law development considering indirect intent to be criminal had been consistent with the substance of the criminal offence in