21 applications against Norway concerning children taken into public care

CtEDO 2021-07-15 0,91

Published on 9 August 2021 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 42796/20 T.H. against Norway lodged on 14 September 2020 communicated on 15 July 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns proceedings in which in which it was decided

CtEDO 2021-11-25 0,89

, a lay person, dissented. He stated, among other things, that he felt that the application for adoption had been based on general research and that this was insufficient to justify adoption. Furthermore, he stated that if adoption was auth

CtEDO 2023-09-05 0,89

no. 64808/16, §§ 67 ‐ 71, 19 November 2019) or formed important parts of the context in which violations have occurred (see Hernehult, cited above, §§ 73-74, concerning the applicant in the present case, and Strand Lobben and Others, cited

CtEDO 2024-01-08 0,89

Published on 29 January 2024 SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 24657/21 and 31423/22 J.K. against Norway and L.L. and P.L. against Norway lodged on 12 April 2021 and 16 June 2022 respectively communicated on 8 January 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF

CtEDO 2021-11-25 0,89

with the general aim that the family be reunited. They pointed out that it had been established that the applicant would not be able to resume care of X within a reasonable time. 41. The third party interveners – the Governments of the Czec