CtEDO 26.10.2023 Auto

CASE OF K.P. v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
26.10.2023
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF K.P. v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2023)
HUDOC · oficial

Ieșiți din listă (Art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Strângerea cererilor; (Art. 37-1) Respectul pentru drepturile omului; (Art. 37-1-c) Examinarea continuă nu este justificată;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - Lungimea deținerii anterioare); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-10-26
0,99
CASE OF K.P. v. POLAND
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility
CtEDO 2023-11-23
0,94
CASE OF WAŁĘSA v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Imparti
CtEDO 2023-09-14
0,94
Ł.K. v. POLAND
applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to p
CtEDO 2025-11-13
0,94
CASE OF A.R. v. POLAND
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35
CtEDO 2023-11-23
0,94
CASE OF WAŁĘSA v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Imparti
Sursă