CtEDO 04.12.2025 RO

Decision Vascautanu v. Romania - Court confirms effectiveness of preventive remedy under Article 56 of Law no. 254/2013

HOTĂRÂRE
04.12.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Decision Vascautanu v. Romania - Court confirms effectiveness of preventive remedy under Article 56 of Law no. 254/2013 (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-12-20
0,90
PLATON v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
Law no. 254/2013 on sentencing, execution of sentences, and detention (“Law no. 254/2013”) an effective remedy in respect of the applicants’ complaints under Article 3? In the affirmative, the Government are invited to provide examples of d
CtEDO 2023-06-28
0,89
CASE OF VASILICĂ MOCANU AGAINST ROMANIA
Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)159 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Vasilică Mocanu against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 June 2023 at the 1470 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicati
CtEDO 2024-06-13
0,88
CASE OF VĂCEAN AGAINST ROMANIA
Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)104 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Văcean against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 June 2024 at the 1501 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No. Ca
CtEDO 2014-09-17
0,88
CASE OF BUCUREȘTEANU AGAINST ROMANIA
Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)152 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Bucureşteanu against Romania Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 20558/04 BUCUREŞTEANU 16/04/2013 16/07/2013 (Adopted by the Committee of Min
CtEDO 2025-11-07
0,88
CASE OF E.S. AGAINST ROMANIA AND BULGARIA
to give effect to the judgment, and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in the present case (see document DH-DD(2025)239 ); Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have
Sursă