Judgment I.L. v. Switzerland (no. 2) - applicant’s detention in conditions unsuited to his health

CtEDO 2024-10-23 0,89

DH-DD(2024)1137 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings were reopened, the initial judgment ordering the applicant’s subsequent preventive detention annulled and the applican

CtEDO 2025-02-11 0,89

regard to the nature and severity of the applicant’s health issues, was the detention itself compatible with his state of health (see, for example, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, §§ 36-48, ECHR 2002-IX; Gülay Çetin v. Turkey, no. 44084/10

CtEDO 2024-01-30 0,88

Published on 19 February 2024 THIRD SECTION Application no. 46807/21 Simon Pascal MANGOLD against Switzerland lodged on 17 September 2021 communicated on 30 January 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s de

CtEDO 2021-11-08 0,88

Published on 29 November 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 18875/19 Tibor BEREGSZASZY against Switzerland and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 8 November 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE These five cases concern the

CtEDO 2022-05-09 0,88

Published on 30 May 2022 FIRST SECTION Application no. 22198/20 L.M. against Italy lodged on 8 June 2020 communicated on 9 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is affected by a psychiatric disorder and deaf-mutism. The applicat