CtEDO 21.03.2024 RO

Judgment Siec Obywatelska Watchdog Polska v. Poland - NGO’s right to receive and impart information

HOTĂRÂRE
21.03.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Siec Obywatelska Watchdog Polska v. Poland - NGO’s right to receive and impart information (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-09-13
0,91
SIEĆ OBYWATELSKA WATCHDOG POLSKA v. POLAND
under Article 10 of the Convention, that the domestic authorities’ refusal to disclose the requested information amounted to a breach of its right to access information of public interest and that the domestic courts failed to scrutinise pr
CtEDO 2023-07-10
0,88
OWOCE I WARZYWA PODLASIA SP. Z O.O. v. POLAND and 2 other applications
Published on 28 August 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 29320/22 OWOCE I WARZYWA PODLASIA sp. z o.o. against Poland and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 10 July 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants were p
CtEDO 2023-09-05
0,88
SZEWCZYK v. POLAND and 18 other applications
President of Poland on 04/05/2020, on recommendation of the NCJ (resolution no. 782/2019 of 26/07/2019). 19. 42188/22 Winek-Jurczewska v. Poland 23/08/2022 Cecylia Mirosława WINEK-JURCZEWSKA 1961 Warszawa Polish On 18/08/2020 the Warsaw Reg
CtEDO 2023-02-15
0,88
MATKIEWICZ v. POLAND
diusz Sopata), upheld the impugned judgment. All the judges dealing with the applicant’s case were appointed to the Supreme Court pursuant to recommendations of the National Council of the Judiciary ( Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa, “the NCJ”) as
CtEDO 2020-10-05
0,88
WAIS v. POLAND
THE PARTIES 1. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information, within the meaning of Article 10 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the interference with the ap
Sursă