ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.05.2024 RO

Decision Chelleri and Others v. Croatia - Fishermen’s applications connected to Piran Bay dispute found inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
16.05.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Chelleri and Others v. Croatia - Fishermen’s applications connected to Piran Bay dispute found inadmissible (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-03-23
0,90
CHELLERI v. CROATIA and 2 other applications
Was it foreseeable for the applicants that the acts and omissions for which they were convicted constituted minor offences under Croatian law, having regard to the place where they had occurred (see, mutatis mutandis, Plechkov v. Romania, n
CtEDO 2021-09-28
0,89
PINTARIĆ v. CROATIA
nt did not put forward such a complaint in his constitutional complaint (see paragraph 13 above). 46. Accordingly, this complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For th
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,89
ĐURKAN AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
§ 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 3 February 2022. Liv Tigerstedt Krzysztof Wojtyczek Deput
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,89
B.G. v. CROATIA
ković v. Croatia, no. 21188/09, § 79, 12 April 2011). 18. It follows that this application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimou
CtEDO 2022-05-10
0,88
ČOLAK v. CROATIA
ing that the applicant lost his claim in its entirety, he would have in any event had to bear the costs of the two hearings in question according to the “loser pays” rule, which in the Court’s view is not incompatible with his right of acce
Sursă