CtEDO 16.05.2024 RO

Decision Gernelle and S.A. Société d’Exploitation de l’Hebdomadaire Le Point v. France - Telephone tapping complaint: application inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE

16.05.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Decision Gernelle and S.A. Société d’Exploitation de l’Hebdomadaire Le Point v. France - Telephone tapping complaint: application inadmissible (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2019-08-27

0,87

INMOBILIZADOS Y GESTIONES S.L. v. SPAIN

matter and legal dispute; the parties to the proceedings were the same; and the High Court of Justice had ruled against the applicant company based on the same grounds and ratio decidendi. Moreover, both the notices of appeal and the appeal

CtEDO 2021-11-09

0,87

GERBER v. SLOVAKIA

§ 1, the Court finds no separate issue under the former provision. It follows that this complaint must be rejected as being manifestly ill ‐ founded, in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court,

CtEDO 2003-02-04

0,87

DURINGER and OTHERS and GRUNGE v. FRANCE [Extracts]

doubt whatsoever that it constitutes an abuse of the right of application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It follows that the applications lodged by Mr Gérard Duringer and Mr Forest Grunge must be declared inadmissib

CtEDO 2023-10-26

0,87

CASE OF PLECHLO v. SLOVAKIA

FIRST SECTION CASE OF PLECHLO v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 18593/19) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Private life • Correspondence • Court warrant authorising tapping of telephone conversations to which the applicant was randomly a party, in the context o

CtEDO 2021-11-30

0,87

ZEMBOL v. GERMANY

there has been no interference with the applicant’s right to hold an opinion under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention. 11. It follows that the applicant’s complaint must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4

Sursă