CtEDO 22.03.2012 AI

CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
22.03.2012
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2012
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund (CtEDO, 2012)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (Articolul 34 - Victimă); Obiecție preliminară respinsă (Articolul 37-1-b - Materie rezolvată); Rest inadmisibil; Încălcarea Articolului 14+8 - Interdicția discriminării (Articolul 14 - Discriminare) (Articolul 8-1 - Respectul pentru viața familială; Articolul 8 - Dreptul la respectul vieții private și familiale); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 34 - Aplicații individuale (Articolul 34 - Obstrucționarea exercitării dreptului de petiție); Prejudiciu moral - acordare; Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-03-22
1,00
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article
CtEDO 2012-03-22
0,98
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article
CtEDO 2012-03-22
0,97
Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC]
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article
CtEDO 2018-10-23
0,94
CASE OF PETROV AND X v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Hinder the exercise of the right of application;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of
CtEDO 2013-06-06
0,94
CASE OF SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for p
Sursă