CtEDO 23.05.2024 RO

Judgment Patricolo and Others v. Italy - Authorities should have flexibly adapted formal requirements during transition from paper-based to online processing of Court of cassation cases

HOTĂRÂRE

23.05.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Patricolo and Others v. Italy - Authorities should have flexibly adapted formal requirements during transition from paper-based to online processing of Court of cassation cases (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-01-12

0,88

CASE OF FILIPPELLI AGAINST ITALY

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)6 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Carmelo Filippelli against Italy (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 January 2022 at the 1421 st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Applica

CtEDO 2023-11-27

0,87

PUCCINI v. ITALY and 2 other applications

Published on 18 December 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 909/21 Giulio PUCCINI against Italy and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the decisions

CtEDO 2023-11-23

0,87

CATULLO AND OTHERS v. ITALY

/09/2023 - 200 30 12641/23 09/03/2023 Marilena MAZZUCA 1971 Falbo Cristina Cosenza Catanzaro Court of Appeal, R.G. 141/2020, 07/02/2020 Ministry of Justice 12/09/2023 - 200 30 12644/23 09/03/2023 Sergio FORTE 1958 Falbo Cristina Cosenza Cat

CtEDO 2025-06-12

0,87

LICIBERTO v. ITALY

/05 and 28614/06, § 111, 20 November 2018)? 2. Did the dismissal of the appeal by the Court of Cassation on the ground that the applicant had not complied with the principle of autonomy of the appeal on points of law ( autosufficienza del r

CtEDO 2024-07-02

0,87

CASCETTA v. ITALY

stiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 97, 25 October 2012, Lekić v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480/07, § 97, 11 December 2018, and the case-law cited therein, and Bežanić and Baškarad v. Croatia, nos. 16140/15 and 13322/16, § 63,

Sursă