Grand Chamber judgment Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (Russian version)

CtEDO 2015-09-24 0,90

s against Russian Federation Application Case Judgment of Final on 43370/04+ CATAN AND OTHERS [1] 19/10/2012 Grand Chamber (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2015 at the 1236th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Com

CtEDO 2015-03-12 0,90

Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)46 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Catan and Others against Russian Federation Application Case Judgment of Final on 43370/04+ CATAN AND OTHERS [1] 19/10/2012 Grand Chamber (A

CtEDO 2020-09-03 0,90

s in cases to which it is a party; STRONGLY URGED the Russian authorities to pay the just satisfaction and default interest owing to the applicants without further delay and to provide an action plan setting out their concrete proposals as

CtEDO 2014-08-25 0,90

the cases of Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], (No. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII) and Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC] (nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, §§ 102-123, 19 October 2012) on account of the circumstances of t

CtEDO 2014-07-11 0,89

99, ECHR 2004-VII) and Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC] (nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, §§ 102-123, 19 October 2012) on account of the circumstances of the present case? 2. Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breac