CtEDO 30.10.2012 Auto

P. and S. v. Poland

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
30.10.2012
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-d - Educational supervision);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2012
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
P. and S. v. Poland (CtEDO, 2012)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară s-a adăugat la fonduri și a respins [art. 35-1 - Epuizarea recoursurilor interne];Obiecția preliminară s-a adăugat la fonduri și a respins (art. 34 - Victim);Obiecția preliminară aferentă (art. 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Obligații pozitive;art. 8 - Respectarea vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Respectarea vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Dreptul de libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Deprivare a libertății;art. 5-1-d - Supravegherea educațională);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interdicție a torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradării) (Aspect substantiv);

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-10-30
0,99
CASE OF P. AND S. v. POLAND
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respec
CtEDO 2012-04-17
0,96
CASE OF PIECHOWICZ v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detent
CtEDO 2012-04-17
0,96
Piechowicz v. Poland
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detent
CtEDO 2025-11-13
0,95
CASE OF A.R. v. POLAND
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35
CtEDO 2022-10-06
0,95
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tri
Sursă