Judgment Z v. the Czech Republic – complaint by a… · CtEDO 2024

CtEDO 2022-06-23

0,87

Grosam v. the Czech Republic

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2022-06-23

0,87

CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2022-06-23

0,87

CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC - [Czech Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2022-06-23

0,87

CASE OF GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2018-05-02

0,87

CASE OF R & L, S.R.O. AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND 3 OTHER CASES

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation; Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted

Judgment Z v. the Czech Republic – complaint by alleged victim of sexual assault about shortcomings in former criminal-law system

Grupate prin similitudine semantică