ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 20.06.2024 RO

Judgment Spišák v. the Czech Republic - Age-based different treatment of remand detainees was discrimination

HOTĂRÂRE
20.06.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Spišák v. the Czech Republic - Age-based different treatment of remand detainees was discrimination (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-06-20
0,88
ĐURĐEVIĆ v. CROATIA
? 4. Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his age, health and education, in breach of Article 14, taken in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention, or in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 thereto (see Schwizg
CtEDO 2022-03-02
0,87
HUSIĆ v. CROATIA
refused to persons fulfilling the requirements for a regular old age pension. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in
CtEDO 2024-10-01
0,87
HUSIĆ v. CROATIA
wide margin of appreciation in matters concerning general measures of economic or social strategy (see Savickis and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 49270/11, § 184, 9 June 2022, and the cases cited therein), the Court considers that the applican
CtEDO 2023-03-14
0,87
W v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
no. 18249/02, 9 May 2006; Diamante and Pelliccioni v. San Marino, no. 32250/08, 27 September 2011; Suur v. Estonia, no. 41736/18, 20 October 2020)? 4. Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of sex, contrary to Article 14 of t
CtEDO 2022-06-23
0,87
Grosam v. the Czech Republic
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to
Sursă