CtEDO 20.06.2024 RO

Decision Morabito and 45 other applications v. Italy - Applications from doctors challenging a difference in remuneration as a result of a delay in transposing an EU Directive: inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE

20.06.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Decision Morabito and 45 other applications v. Italy - Applications from doctors challenging a difference in remuneration as a result of a delay in transposing an EU Directive: inadmissible (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-11-16

0,89

LORINI v. ITALY

the right of individual application and amounted to an abuse of that right within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. The application must therefore be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. For these

CtEDO 2023-11-14

0,88

CA.RO. S.R.L. v. ITALY

the Court can see nothing manifestly unfair or unreasonable in the decisions of the domestic courts to declare the applicant company’s claim inadmissible, inter alia, on the grounds that the company had to bear the consequences of its choic

CtEDO 2021-05-18

0,88

UMORU v. ITALY

order, the Council of State being an effective remedy to still be exhausted by the applicant, the Court considers that the applicant’s complaint under Article 8 of the Convention must at the present time be regarded as premature and that it

CtEDO 2022-07-21

0,88

Darboe and Camara v. Italy

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;In

CtEDO 2022-07-21

0,88

CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 -

Sursă