Court adjourns 2,354 prisoners’ voting rights cases

CtEDO 2018-12-06 0,86

-mentioned obligation; Recalling that, in the present judgments, the Court found that the general, automatic and indiscriminate restriction on the right of convicted prisoners to vote was incompatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the

CtEDO 2011-02-15 0,85

15 above) in order to allow serving prisoners to vote. However, it made a declaration of incompatibility in respect of section 3(1) of the 1983 Act (see paragraph 16 above). 20. Further details of legal challenges brought by serving prisone

CtEDO 2015-12-09 0,85

in March 2014, the Committee welcomed the specially appointed Parliamentary Committee’s recommendation that all prisoners serving sentences of 12 months or less should be entitled to vote as a constructive contribution to the legislative pr

CtEDO 2019-01-15 0,85

Communicated on 15 January 2019 FOURTH SECTION Applications nos. 10600/18 and 17504/18 Gheorghița BRĂNIȘTEANU against Romania and Ioan-Dumitru MIRONESCU against Romania lodged on 24 April 2018 and 23 March 2018 respectively SUBJECT MATTER O

CtEDO 2017-07-04 0,85

, Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005‐IX; Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 63849/09, 21 July 2016; Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, 4 July 2013; Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingd