Legal summary - Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation or application of Article 6 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention

RESPONDENT

ROU

HOTĂRÂRE

28.06.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Legal summary - Decision on a request for an advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 concerning the interpretation or application of Article 6 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2020-09-21

0,88

PETRESCU c. ROUMANIE

hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? 3. If so, was that interf

CtEDO 2022-03-09

0,87

CASE OF N. AGAINST ROMANIA

terms of Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the final judgments of the Court in any case to which they are a party, fully, effectively and promptly; EXHORTED the authorities, at the appropriate level, to take, as a matte

CtEDO 2024-11-12

0,87

RUSU v. ROMANIA

1 to the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the re-assessment of the applicant’s pension rights and the demand for the retrospective repayment of an important sum of money amount to a deprivation of his possessions within the meaning o

CtEDO 2015-05-19

0,87

CASE OF CĂPITAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

mar, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. In accordance with Protocol No. 14, after informing the respondent Government, the applications were assigned to a Committee of three Judges. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASES 4. On the

CtEDO 2018-05-31

0,87

CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA

Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly

Sursă