Restoration of application Bryska v. Ukraine following contact by the applicant

CtEDO 2026-02-05 0,89

ed to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), no. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2 November 2023, and Zhadan and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), no. 29283/13 and 26 others, 14 December 2

CtEDO 2024-04-11 0,89

which there was a lack of communication with certain applicants since the full ‐ scale military attack launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 24 February 2022 (see Bryska and Others v. Ukraine (dec.) [Committee], nos. 11706/1

CtEDO 2024-06-27 0,89

Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), nos. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2 November 2023, and Zhadan and O

CtEDO 2025-10-16 0,88

, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska and Others v. Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), no. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2

CtEDO 2023-09-14 0,88

were made to reach the applicant’s representative by phone in order to verify whether the applicant was still interested in pursuing the application. Despite this, those Registry’s attempts were unsuccessful. THE LAW In the light of the for