Judgment Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia - prisoners' voting rights in Russia

CtEDO 2019-09-25 0,90

prived of their liberty in a detention facility was incompatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention; Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment

CtEDO 2007-10-22 0,90

10 § 1 of the Convention and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 thereto the applicant complained about the alleged violation of his right to freedom of expression and, in particular, his right to free expression of the opinion in the choice of the

CtEDO 2017-07-04 0,90

, Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005‐IX; Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 63849/09, 21 July 2016; Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, 4 July 2013; Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingd

CtEDO 2009-10-19 0,89

Article 10 of the Convention complaining that his right to receive information had been violated by a public official’s refusal to give him certain documents. The applicant further complains under Article 6 of the Convention that there were