Decision Hulki Günes v. Turkey - complaint inadmissible concerning reopening of proceedings

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,91

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2020-10-20 0,90

complaint has not been raised by the applicant before the Court, even in substance. Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For

CtEDO 2002-05-23 0,90

as being manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously DECLARES ADMISSIBLE, without prejudging the merits, the applicant’s complaints concerning his right to a

CtEDO 2003-12-02 0,90

the merits, the applicants’ complaints concerning the alleged interference with their right to freedom of expression, the independence and impartiality of the Diyarbakır State Security Court, the refusal of the Court of Cassation to hold a

CtEDO 2020-06-16 0,90

nt’s complaint concerning his inability to examine the victims before the trial court was not sufficient to interrupt the running of the six-month period, hence the present application was introduced outside the six-month time limit and is