Tymoshenko v. Ukraine no. 2 - case concerning criminal proceedings communicated to the Government

CtEDO 2013-10-07 0,88

COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings in connection with her son’s murder have not been effective. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the procedural protection of the

CtEDO 2014-12-18 0,88

l protection of the right to life, were the domestic proceedings in the present case in breach of Article 2 of the Convention? The Government are invited to provide: (a) a chronological list of pre-investigative, investigative, and judicial

CtEDO 2014-12-16 0,88

tion with a view to resolving the issues raised by the application. The Government, admitting that the criminal prosecution against the applicant had been politically motivated, acknowledged a violation of the applicant’s rights guaranteed

CtEDO 2014-12-18 0,88

were the domestic proceedings in the present case in breach of Article 2 of the Convention? 2. Did the domestic authorities deal with the applicant’s civil claims in compliance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as regards the requirement

CtEDO 2013-04-30 0,88

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Pro