ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 16.07.2013 RO

Judgment Wegrzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland - newspaper article found to be inaccurate remaining in internet archive

HOTĂRÂRE

16.07.2013

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Wegrzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland - newspaper article found to be inaccurate remaining in internet archive (CtEDO, 2013)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2013-05-29

CASES OF WOJCIECHOWSKI AND KAZIMIERCZAK AGAINST POLAND

g m e n t o f t h e E u r o p ea n C o u r t o f H u m a n R i g h t s, w i ll be s u f f i c i e n t t o c o n c l u d e t h a t P o l a n d h as c o m p l i ed w i t h i t s o bl i ga t i o n s u n d er Ar t i c l e 46, paragraph 1 of t h

CtEDO 2013-05-29

AFFAIRES WOJCIECHOWSKI ET KAZIMIERCZAK CONTRE LA POLOGNE

r in d i v i du a l m e a s u r e s a r e n o t n ec e s s a r y i n t h e p r e s e nt cases a n d t h at t h e g e n er a l measur e s ad o p t ed, i n pa r t i c u l ar p u blica t i o n and d i ss e mi na t i o n o f t h e j ud g m e n

CtEDO 2015-04-21

SZWED-WÓJTOWICZ v. POLAND

of Kaprykowski v. Poland, no. 23052/05, §§ 36-39, 3 February 2009; Sławomir Musiał v. Poland, no. 28300/06, §§ 48-61 ECHR 2009... (extracts); and Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885/04, §§ 74-85, 13 October 2009. More recent developments are des

CtEDO 2007-12-11

SZPALIKOWSKI v. POLAND

and Witkowska-Toboła v. Poland, cited above, §§ 62-79). Having regard to the circumstances of the present case, the Court finds no reason justifying its departure from the conclusion reached in the above-mentioned cases. Accordingly, the ap

CtEDO 2008-12-09

WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND (NO. 2)

. Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Takes note of the terms o

Sursă