CtEDO 14.11.2013 Auto

CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
14.11.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-d - Minors);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Obtain attendance of witnesses);Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (Aspectul susținut);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Privire de libertate;art. 5-1-d - Minor);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6+6-3-c - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă;art. 6-3-c - Apărare prin asistență juridică) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-c - Apărarea martorilor) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-d - Examinarea martorilor);art. 6-3-d

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
Sursă