ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 04.06.2015 RO

Decision Ljubljanska banka d.d. v. Croatia - case inadmissible due to bank's lack of standing to bring application

HOTĂRÂRE
04.06.2015
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Ljubljanska banka d.d. v. Croatia - case inadmissible due to bank's lack of standing to bring application (CtEDO, 2015)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-12-12
0,89
NOVA LJUBLJANSKA BANKA D.D. v. CROATIA
inadmissible under Article 35 § 3 (a) and (b) of the Convention for being manifestly ill-founded and for lack of a significant disadvantage, respectively, and that it must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4 thereof. Complaint under Arti
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,89
OTP BANKA d.d. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
the Convention as manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4 thereof. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notif
CtEDO 2022-11-22
0,89
POLDRUGAČ v. CROATIA
Published on 12 December 2022 SECOND SECTION Application no. 35776/22 Danijela POLDRUGAČ against Croatia lodged on 14 July 2022 communicated on 22 November 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the decision of the domesti
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,89
B.G. v. CROATIA
ković v. Croatia, no. 21188/09, § 79, 12 April 2011). 18. It follows that this application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimou
CtEDO 2014-11-04
0,89
MILOSAVLJEVIĆ v. CROATIA
the amount of compensation he was due for the pension debt. THE LAW 14. The Court notes that the present case does not differ in any respect from the case of Kovačević and Others v. Croatia (cited above) declared inadmissible as manifestly
Sursă