CASE OF CIOBAN AGAINST ROMANIA AND 5 OTHER CASES

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2018)15 Execuția hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Șase cazuri împotriva României (Adoptat de Comitetul de Miniștri la 10 ianuarie 2018 la reuniunea 1303 rd a Deputaților Miniștrilor) Cerere nr. Cazul de la decizia 18404/15 Daniel-Sorin CIOBAN ȘI 9 ALTE APLICAȚII 30/03/2017 33090/15 Sebastian ILIESCU ȘI 4 ALTE APLICAȚII 30/03/2017 68961/14 Ioan KOVACS-BUIAN ȘI 7 ALTE APLICAȚII 30/03/2017 23191/14 Vasile Tarzan PREDA 04/04/2017 62168/14 Sebastian-Petru TOȘA 12/01/2017 6173/14+ Darius VEREȘAN Ș Ș Ș ȘI Nicolae CIUPERCĂ 30/03/2017 Comitetul de miniștri, în conformitate cu art. 39 alineatul (4) din Convenția pentru protecția drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că Comitetul supraveghează executarea unor așecuri prietenoase în temeiul prezentului regulament, în conformitate cu art. 4 din Regulamentul (CE) nr.

Resolution

CM/ResDH(2018)15

Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights

Six cases against Romania

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 January 2018 at the 1303

rd

meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Date of the decision

18404/15

Daniel-Sorin CIOBAN AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

30/03/2017

33090/15

Sebastian ILIESCU AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS

30/03/2017

68961/14

Ioan KOVACS-BUIAN and 7 OTHER APPLICATIONS

30/03/2017

23191/14

Vasile Tarzan PREDA

04/04/2017

62168/14

Sebastian-Petru TOȘA

12/01/2017

61732/14+

Darius VEREȘAN AND AND Nicolae Liviu CIUPERCĂ

30/03/2017

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and

DECIDES to close their examination.