Decision Hansen v. Norway - application by man formerly known as Breivik rejected as inadmissible

CtEDO 2023-12-12 0,88

a) and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 January 2024. Dorothee von Arnim Jovan Ilievski Deputy Regis

CtEDO 2023-07-11 0,87

and thus “necessary in a democratic society”, for the purposes of Article 8 § 2. 11. The Court concludes that the application is “manifestly ill-founded” within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected in accordance with Artic

CtEDO 2025-10-28 0,87

Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Ex

CtEDO 2002-03-12 0,87

, declares admissible, without prejudging the merits, the applicant’s complaints that her claim was dismissed arbitrarily and that she had no effective remedy at her disposal in this respect; by a majority, declares inadmissible the applica

CtEDO 2007-06-14 0,87

fair balance was struck in this case in that the applicant’s expulsion and exclusion from Norway was proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and therefore necessary in a democratic society. It follows that the application is manifestly