Decision O’Neill v. the United Kingdom - case concerning convicted paedophile inadmissible

CtEDO 2003-05-27 0,87

the Convention and must be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Declares admissible, without prejudging the merits, the applicant’s complaints under Articles 14 in conj

CtEDO 2020-03-24 0,87

of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention (see Čonka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 76, ECHR 2002 ‐ I and Black v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56745/00, 27 September 2005). For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadm

CtEDO 2021-03-23 0,87

§ 81, ECHR 2002 ‐ IV). No violation of Article 5 § 1 is disclosed and the complaint must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible.