CtEDO 20.05.2025 Auto

CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen

RESPONDENT
DEU
HOTĂRÂRE
20.05.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art. 10) Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 11 - Libertatea de adunare și de asociere (art. 11-1 - Libertatea de adunare pașnică) citită în lumina articolului 10 - (Art. 10) Libertatea de expresie - {general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de expresie);Leziuni pecuniare - leziuni respinse (art. 41 - Leziuni pecuniare;Să satisfacem);Leziuni pecuniare - constatări de încălcare suficientă (art. 41 - Leziuni morale;Să satisfacem)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-05-20
0,99
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] by the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.
CtEDO 2025-05-20
0,98
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,94
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,94
CASE OF EMİNAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,94
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
Sursă