CtEDO 17.09.2019 Auto

CASE OF BABCHIN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
17.09.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Russia)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BABCHIN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Nicio încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (Aspectul susținut) (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Pedeapsa inhumană) (Aspect substantiv) (Russia);Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea sau detenția legală) (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenție) (Russia);Nici o încălcare a articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Rusia);Nici o încălcare a articolului 13 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediul eficace) (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediul eficace) (Rusia)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-09-17
0,96
CASE OF BERZAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2019-09-17
0,96
CASE OF NEGRUȚA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman trea
CtEDO 2021-11-30
0,96
CASE OF COLIBAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2019-09-17
0,96
AFFAIRE BABCHIN c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET RUSSIE
Non-violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradant;Traitement inhumain) (Volet matériel) (République de Moldova);Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradan
CtEDO 2017-05-30
0,96
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradin
Sursă