CtEDO 03.03.2020 Auto

CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
03.03.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; (art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nedrept;Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Procedura prevăzută prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau deținerea;art. 5-1-c - Suspect rezonabil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Precizie de revizuire); Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-03-03
1,00
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
CtEDO 2020-03-03
1,00
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,99
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Spanish Translation] by the Spanish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,98
CASE OF AKGÜN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
CtEDO 2021-06-29
0,97
CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article
Sursă