CtEDO 28.05.2020 Auto

CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
AZE
HOTĂRÂRE
28.05.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Charged with a criminal offence;Presumption of innocence);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecții preliminare respinse (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menținerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6-2 - Acuzat cu o infracțiune; Presumarea inocencei); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dumnizarea justă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,97
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,97
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN - [Polish Translation] legal summary by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,97
CASE OF FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,97
Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,94
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
Sursă