Decision Kaman v. Turkey - Constitutional Court remedy : non-exhaustion of domestic remedies

CtEDO 2009-09-22 0,89

is annexed to this judgment. N.B. F.A. DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKAŞ Unlike the majority, I consider that the objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies raised by the Government should not have been rejected. Consequently, I can

CtEDO 2019-03-14 0,89

cases concerning the excessive length of domestic proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in this respect (see Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)298 concerning the Ormancı and Others group of cases); Having satisfied itself that all the me

CtEDO 2017-05-16 0,89

4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 June 2017. Hasan Bakırcı Julia Laffranque Deputy Re

CtEDO 2017-11-07 0,89

Law no. 6384, the Court reiterates its conclusion in the case of Turgut and Others (cited above). It therefore concludes that the application must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic reme

CtEDO 2017-06-27 0,88

, 16 June 2015). 17. As a result, taking into account the Government’s preliminary objection, the Court concludes that the application must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. F