CtEDO 22.10.2020 Auto

CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
GEO
HOTĂRÂRE
22.10.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6+6-3-e - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-e - Free assistance of interpreter;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Investigare efectivă) (aspect de procedură);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect de susținere);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Audierea echitabilă);Nici o încălcare a articolului 6+6-3-e - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Audierea echitabilă) (art. 6-3-e - Asistența gratuită a interpretului;art. 6-3 - Drepturile de apărare;art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil); prejudiciu moral (art. 41 - Daune morală)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-10-22
0,99
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of tortur
CtEDO 2020-10-22
0,99
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of tortur
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,95
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,95
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2023-09-07
0,95
CASE OF OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Impartial tribunal);No violat
Sursă